About the Data
Storing and reviewing
information about student learning.
As the
learning inquiry paradigm expands at MJC, the process will generate a wealth of
data about learning in MJC courses, programs, services, and the
institution overall. The data will be used to inform major
college processes like program review, curriculum, planning and
budgeting, and staffing. Also, the college is legally prepared
to proceed with data gathering, as evidenced by the informed consent
FERPA clause of the college catalog, which alerts students to their
participation in educational research.
An Infrastructure for Data
At this
time, Modesto Junior College has not determined how it will
systematically and officially gather and house the data. However,
many are already working independently without such a system by
gathering, evaluating and storing learning data within courses,
sequences, services and programs and using it to inform dialog with
stakeholders in their immediate areas. In the semesters to come, the SLO Committee, in concert with the Academic Senate and College
Administration, will convene to determine how learning data will be
housed and circulated to best inform strategic planning and all of
the above processes.
What's Happening
Nationwide?
The
Council for Higher Education Accreditation
(CHEA) recently prepared a special report,
Accreditation and Accountability,
in December 2006 which
provided a sweeping overview of how data should be used to improve
learning in colleges nationwide. While the document was prepared for
accrediting bodies and college administrators, it recommends
strategies to both accreditors and institutions on how data should
be used and stored for the benefit of learning. In this report, CHEA
recommends various models for gathering data to accrediting agencies
(like WASC/ACCJC). Options include:
-
Program Review - in which expectations/objectives
are determined by the institution or program, and direct
evidence of learning is collected
-
Academic Audit - in which the effectiveness of student
learning objectives is examined indirectly by looking at the
adequacy of institutional or program processes for assuring
quality
-
Academic Standards Audit - which checks the consistency and
adequacy of grading standards as they relate to student work
-
Third-party certification - where student competency is
examined directly by an external body.
(Updated
May 14, 2007)
